Price coming soon
Happy for Men vs Bad
from €38.95
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Happy for Men
Exclusive to Bad
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Happy for Men
Bad
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Not its territory
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Happy for Men
- It brings what the other lacks — juniper, lemon, sandalwood.
- More track record: launched in 1999, it has been worn for 27 years.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Bad
- Facets Happy for Men does not have: vetiver, caraway, tobacco.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (7 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- Released in 2016, when the other dates from 1999.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — caraway, cashmere wood are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Most versatile
Bad — it holds 7 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
-
Most original
Bad — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (caraway, cashmere wood)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.