from €38.95
Bad vs Dune pour Homme
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Bad
Exclusive to Dune pour Homme
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Bad
Dune pour Homme
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Bad
- vetiver, caraway, tobacco: all materials absent from Dune pour Homme.
- More recent creation (2016, against 1997).
- Notes that are uncommon with us (caraway, cashmere wood): the less conventional of the two.
- Less at ease in the “night” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Dune pour Homme
- Its pyramid opens on sandalwood, mugwort, jasmine, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- 29 years of existence (1997): it has proved itself for longer.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Dune pour Homme — signature carried by amber
-
Most original
Bad — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (caraway, cashmere wood)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.