Price coming soon
Happy for Men vs Hugo Energise
from €50.95
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Happy for Men 80 out of 100, Hugo Energise 80 out of 100. Citrus: Happy for Men 80 out of 100, Hugo Energise 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Happy for Men 40 out of 100, Hugo Energise 80 out of 100. Musky: Happy for Men 40 out of 100, Hugo Energise 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Happy for Men
Hugo Energise
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Not its territory
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Happy for Men
- Its pyramid opens on cedar, bergamot, lavender, nowhere to be found opposite.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Hugo Energise
- mint, apple: all materials absent from Happy for Men.
- It covers more ground: 7 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 5.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: juniper, mint).
The verdict
-
Most versatile
Hugo Energise — at ease in 7 contexts out of 8, against 5
-
Most original
Hugo Energise — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (juniper, mint)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.