from €38.95
Bad vs Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme
from €50.02
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Bad 80 out of 100, Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Bad 40 out of 100, Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme 40 out of 100. Citrus: Bad 40 out of 100, Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme 40 out of 100. Musky: Bad absent, Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Bad
Exclusive to Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Bad
Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Bad
- Budget in its favour — €38.95 against €50.02.
- Facets Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme does not have: caraway, cashmere wood.
- More recent creation (2016, against 1994).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — caraway, cashmere wood are among the least common notes in our database.
Why choose Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme
- It brings what the other lacks — clary sage, white musk, neroli.
- 32 years of existence (1994): it has proved itself for longer.
- Expect €50.02 at the very least, more than its rival.
The verdict
-
Best price
Bad — €11.07 difference in its favour
-
Most original
Bad — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (caraway, cashmere wood)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.