from €8.00
Falling Trees vs Macaque Fuji Apple
from €54.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Falling Trees 80 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Woody: Falling Trees 80 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Falling Trees 40 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Citrus: Falling Trees 40 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple absent. Fruity: Falling Trees absent, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Falling Trees
- It costs less: from €8.00, while the other starts at €54.00.
- It brings what the other lacks — cypriol, bergamot, elemi.
Why choose Macaque Fuji Apple
- Facets Falling Trees does not have: apple, sandalwood, hinoki.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (hinoki, myrrh): the less conventional of the two.
- The investment is heavier: €54.00 minimum.
The verdict
-
Best price
Falling Trees — €8.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €54.00
-
Most original
Macaque Fuji Apple — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (hinoki, myrrh)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.
Also compared
- Falling Trees vs Macaque Yuzu Régime des Fleurs vs Zoologist
- Macaque Fuji Apple vs Macaque Yuzu Zoologist
- Falling Trees vs Sauvage Régime des Fleurs vs Dior
- Macaque Fuji Apple vs Via Manzoni 20 Zoologist vs Xerjoff
- Falling Trees vs Bleu de Chanel Régime des Fleurs vs Chanel
- Macaque Fuji Apple vs Gypsy Water Zoologist vs Byredo