from €255.00
Russian Leather vs Polo Deep Blue
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Russian Leather 80 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Leather: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Musky: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Polo Deep Blue
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Russian Leather
Polo Deep Blue
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Russian Leather
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Its pyramid opens on juniper, vetiver, birch, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More recent creation (2015, against 2003).
Why choose Polo Deep Blue
- basil, mango, mandarin: all materials absent from Russian Leather.
- Launched in 2003, it has 23 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Russian Leather — Eau de Parfum, so more material than an eau de toilette
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.