from €255.00
Russian Leather vs Polo Blue
from €37.14
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Russian Leather 80 out of 100, Polo Blue 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Blue 80 out of 100. Leather: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Blue 80 out of 100. Musky: Russian Leather 40 out of 100, Polo Blue 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Russian Leather
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- juniper, vetiver, birch: all materials absent from Polo Blue.
- It is 13 years younger (2015 against 2002).
- The more expensive of the two (from €255.00).
Why choose Polo Blue
- It costs less: from €37.14, while the other starts at €255.00.
- Its pyramid opens on melon, cucumber, geranium, nowhere to be found opposite.
- 24 years of existence (2002): it has proved itself for longer.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: cucumber, melon).
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Best price
Polo Blue — €217.86 difference in its favour
-
Most concentrated
Russian Leather — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most original
Polo Blue — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (cucumber, melon)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.