from €54.90
Luna Rossa Ocean vs Polo Deep Blue
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Luna Rossa Ocean 65 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Luna Rossa Ocean 75 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Citrus: Luna Rossa Ocean 55 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue absent. Musky: Luna Rossa Ocean 45 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Leather: Luna Rossa Ocean absent, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Marine: Luna Rossa Ocean 40 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Polo Deep Blue
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Luna Rossa Ocean
- bergamot, ambroxan, geranium: all materials absent from Polo Deep Blue.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aromatic and citrus.
- It is 18 years younger (2021 against 2003).
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Polo Deep Blue
- Its pyramid opens on basil, mango, leather, nowhere to be found opposite.
- leather give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
- 23 years of existence (2003): it has proved itself for longer.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Luna Rossa Ocean — signature carried by aromatic and citrus
-
Most enveloping
Polo Deep Blue — signature carried by leather
-
Most versatile
Polo Deep Blue — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
-
Most original
Polo Deep Blue — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (mango, basil)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.