Price coming soon
Gentle Fluidity Silver vs Faces of Francis
from €250.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Gentle Fluidity Silver 80 out of 100, Faces of Francis 40 out of 100. Woody: Gentle Fluidity Silver 80 out of 100, Faces of Francis 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Gentle Fluidity Silver 40 out of 100, Faces of Francis 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: Gentle Fluidity Silver 40 out of 100, Faces of Francis 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Gentle Fluidity Silver
Faces of Francis
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Gentle Fluidity Silver
- Facets Faces of Francis does not have: ambroxan, white musk, sandalwood.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- “spring” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Faces of Francis
- It brings what the other lacks — oud, pistachio, aldehydes.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: pistachio, driftwood).
The verdict
-
Most versatile
Faces of Francis — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 6
-
Most original
Faces of Francis — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (pistachio, driftwood)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.