from €250.00
Faces of Francis vs London Funk
from €250.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Faces of Francis 80 out of 100, London Funk 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Faces of Francis 40 out of 100, London Funk 46 out of 100. Amber: Faces of Francis 40 out of 100, London Funk 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: Faces of Francis 40 out of 100, London Funk 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Faces of Francis
London Funk
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Faces of Francis
- Its pyramid opens on oud, pistachio, aldehydes, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: pistachio, driftwood).
Why choose London Funk
- blackcurrant, tea, basil: all materials absent from Faces of Francis.
The verdict
-
Most original
Faces of Francis — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (pistachio, driftwood)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.