Price coming soon
Pi Neo vs Polo Black
from €49.39
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Pi Neo 80 out of 100, Polo Black absent. Amber: Pi Neo 53 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Gourmand: Pi Neo 53 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Citrus: Pi Neo 53 out of 100, Polo Black 40 out of 100. Fruity: Pi Neo absent, Polo Black 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Polo Black
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Pi Neo
Polo Black
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Pi Neo
- Its pyramid opens on mandarin, cardamom, cedar, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 6).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Polo Black
- clary sage, mango, lemon: all materials absent from Pi Neo.
- Warmth wins out, with amber and gourmand in support.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — mango, clary sage are among the least common notes in our database.
- Less at ease in the “summer” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Polo Black — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most versatile
Pi Neo — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Polo Black — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (mango, clary sage)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.