Price coming soon
Visit vs Polo Black
from €49.39
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Visit 80 out of 100, Polo Black absent. Amber: Visit 53 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Gourmand: Visit 53 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Citrus: Visit 40 out of 100, Polo Black 40 out of 100. Fruity: Visit absent, Polo Black 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Visit
Polo Black
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Not its territory
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Visit
- mandarin, cinnamon, cypress: all materials absent from Polo Black.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Polo Black
- Its pyramid opens on clary sage, mango, lemon, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber and gourmand.
- Less at ease in the “summer” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Polo Black — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most versatile
Visit — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.