Price coming soon
Amber Oud Blue Edition vs Polo Black
from €49.39
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Amber Oud Blue Edition 80 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Citrus: Amber Oud Blue Edition 80 out of 100, Polo Black 40 out of 100. Gourmand: Amber Oud Blue Edition 80 out of 100, Polo Black 80 out of 100. Fruity: Amber Oud Blue Edition 40 out of 100, Polo Black 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Amber Oud Blue Edition
Exclusive to Polo Black
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Amber Oud Blue Edition
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- It brings what the other lacks — white musk, vanilla, oud.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Polo Black
- Facets Amber Oud Blue Edition does not have: clary sage, mango, patchouli.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — mango, clary sage are among the least common notes in our database.
- Lighter concentration (Eau de Toilette): lower theoretical longevity.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Amber Oud Blue Edition — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Most versatile
Amber Oud Blue Edition — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Polo Black — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (mango, clary sage)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.