from €34.90
Cool Water vs Tommy Bold
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aromatic: Cool Water 70 out of 100, Tommy Bold 80 out of 100. Marine: Cool Water 75 out of 100, Tommy Bold absent. Citrus: Cool Water 55 out of 100, Tommy Bold 40 out of 100. Musky: Cool Water 35 out of 100, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Amber: Cool Water absent, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Woody: Cool Water 45 out of 100, Tommy Bold absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Tommy Bold
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Cool Water
- Facets Tommy Bold does not have: geranium, neroli, cedar.
- Markedly fresher, carried by marine and aromatic.
- Launched in 1988, it has 38 years of life behind it.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
Why choose Tommy Bold
- It brings what the other lacks — ambroxan, clary sage, grapefruit.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- It is 30 years younger (2018 against 1988).
- No offer listed for the moment.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Cool Water — signature carried by marine and aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Tommy Bold — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Tommy Bold — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 5
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.