Price coming soon
Cool Water Intense vs Tommy Bold
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aromatic: Cool Water Intense 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold 80 out of 100. Woody: Cool Water Intense 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold absent. Musky: Cool Water Intense 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Amber: Cool Water Intense absent, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Citrus: Cool Water Intense 40 out of 100, Tommy Bold 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Cool Water Intense
In common
Exclusive to Tommy Bold
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Cool Water Intense
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- Its pyramid opens on vetiver, nowhere to be found opposite.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “night” ground.
Why choose Tommy Bold
- ambroxan, clary sage: all materials absent from Cool Water Intense.
- Warmth wins out, with amber in support.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (mint, ambroxan): the less conventional of the two.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Cool Water Intense — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most enveloping
Tommy Bold — signature carried by amber
-
Most original
Tommy Bold — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (mint, ambroxan)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.