Price coming soon
Philos Aqua vs Tommy Bold
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Philos Aqua 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Woody: Philos Aqua 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold absent. Citrus: Philos Aqua 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold 40 out of 100. Musky: Philos Aqua 80 out of 100, Tommy Bold 53 out of 100. Aromatic: Philos Aqua absent, Tommy Bold 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Tommy Bold
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Philos Aqua
Tommy Bold
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Philos Aqua
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- Facets Tommy Bold does not have: bergamot, geranium, cedar.
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose Tommy Bold
- It brings what the other lacks — mint, clary sage.
- aromatic and citrus pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: mint, ambroxan).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Philos Aqua — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Freshest
Tommy Bold — signature carried by aromatic and citrus
-
Most original
Tommy Bold — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (mint, ambroxan)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.