Price coming soon
1932 vs Eau de Rochas
from €34.95
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
1932
Eau de Rochas
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 1932
- Eau de Parfum against eau de toilette: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- It brings what the other lacks — iris, vetiver, aldehydes.
- It is 43 years younger (2013 against 1970).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose Eau de Rochas
- Facets 1932 does not have: lemon, oakmoss, hyacinth.
- 56 years of existence (1970): it has proved itself for longer.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (hyacinth, honeysuckle): the less conventional of the two.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
1932 — Eau de Parfum, so more material than an eau de toilette
-
Most original
Eau de Rochas — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (hyacinth, honeysuckle)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.