Price coming soon
1932 vs Calandre
from €71.45
The scent fingerprint
Woody: 1932 80 out of 100, Calandre 80 out of 100. Floral: 1932 60 out of 100, Calandre 67 out of 100. Amber: 1932 40 out of 100, Calandre absent. Citrus: 1932 40 out of 100, Calandre 40 out of 100. Musky: 1932 absent, Calandre 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to 1932
No exclusive notes.
Exclusive to Calandre
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 1932
- It is more concentrated — Eau de Parfum where the other is eau de toilette — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- More recent creation (2013, against 1969).
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose Calandre
- It brings what the other lacks — oakmoss, geranium, green notes.
- Launched in 1969, it has 57 years of life behind it.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: green notes, aldehydes).
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
1932 — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most enveloping
1932 — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
1932 — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Calandre — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (green notes, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.