Price coming soon
Curious vs Kirke
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Fruity: Curious 40 out of 100, Kirke 85 out of 100. Floral: Curious 80 out of 100, Kirke 50 out of 100. Gourmand: Curious 40 out of 100, Kirke 60 out of 100. Musky: Curious 40 out of 100, Kirke 45 out of 100. Vanilla: Curious absent, Kirke 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Curious
In common
Exclusive to Kirke
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Curious
- Its pyramid opens on lotus, magnolia, tuberose, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Launched in 2004, it has 22 years of life behind it.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: anjou pear, dragon fruit).
- No offer listed for the moment.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Kirke
- jasmine, blackcurrant, grapefruit: all materials absent from Curious.
- Warmth wins out, with gourmand and vanilla in support.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- It is 9 years younger (2013 against 2004).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Kirke — signature carried by gourmand and vanilla
-
Most versatile
Kirke — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Curious — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (anjou pear, dragon fruit)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.