Duel

Curious vs Kirke

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes the trail that remains (4 h and more)

What are they for?

Curious
Kirke
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Curious

  • Its pyramid opens on lotus, magnolia, tuberose, nowhere to be found opposite.
  • Launched in 2004, it has 22 years of life behind it.
  • More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: anjou pear, dragon fruit).
  • No offer listed for the moment.
  • “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.

Why choose Kirke

  • jasmine, blackcurrant, grapefruit: all materials absent from Curious.
  • Warmth wins out, with gourmand and vanilla in support.
  • Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
  • It is 9 years younger (2013 against 2004).
  • We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.

The verdict

  • Most enveloping

    Kirke — signature carried by gourmand and vanilla

  • Most versatile

    Kirke — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6

  • Most original

    Curious — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (anjou pear, dragon fruit)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared