Price coming soon
Curious vs Aqva Divina
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Curious
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Curious
Aqva Divina
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Curious
- Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- It brings what the other lacks — magnolia, tuberose, dragon fruit.
- More track record: launched in 2004, it has been worn for 22 years.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Aqva Divina
- Facets Curious does not have: quince, mimosa, salt.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
- Released in 2015, when the other dates from 2004.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Curious — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most versatile
Aqva Divina — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.