from €270.00
1888 vs Tyrannosaurus Rex
from €240.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: 1888 80 out of 100, Tyrannosaurus Rex 40 out of 100. Woody: 1888 80 out of 100, Tyrannosaurus Rex 80 out of 100. Warm spicy: 1888 80 out of 100, Tyrannosaurus Rex 40 out of 100. Floral: 1888 40 out of 100, Tyrannosaurus Rex 53 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
What are they for?
1888
Tyrannosaurus Rex
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 1888
- Facets Tyrannosaurus Rex does not have: amber, clove, coriander.
- Warmth wins out, with amber and warm spicy in support.
- The more expensive of the two (from €270.00).
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Tyrannosaurus Rex
- The cheaper of the two: from €240.00, against €270.00.
- It brings what the other lacks — champaca, bergamot, resin.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — champaca, cade are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Best price
Tyrannosaurus Rex — €30.00 difference in its favour
-
Most enveloping
1888 — signature carried by amber and warm spicy
-
Most original
Tyrannosaurus Rex — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (champaca, cade)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.