Price coming soon
Labdanum 18 vs Richwood
from €380.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Labdanum 18 80 out of 100, Richwood 53 out of 100. Amber: Labdanum 18 60 out of 100, Richwood 80 out of 100. Leather: Labdanum 18 40 out of 100, Richwood absent. Musky: Labdanum 18 40 out of 100, Richwood 40 out of 100. Citrus: Labdanum 18 absent, Richwood 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Labdanum 18
In common
Exclusive to Richwood
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Labdanum 18
- Facets Richwood does not have: castoreum.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand and amber.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: castoreum, labdanum).
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “spring” ground.
Why choose Richwood
- It brings what the other lacks — bergamot, rose, grapefruit.
- Freshness dominates, with citrus in the lead.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 7 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Richwood — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
Labdanum 18 — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most versatile
Richwood — 7 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other
-
Most original
Labdanum 18 — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (castoreum, labdanum)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.