Duel

Labdanum 18 vs Richwood

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)

What are they for?

Labdanum 18
Richwood
Seasons
Spring
Not its territory
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Labdanum 18

  • Facets Richwood does not have: castoreum.
  • Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand and amber.
  • More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: castoreum, labdanum).
  • No offer listed for the moment.
  • Our calculated profile does not see it on “spring” ground.

Why choose Richwood

  • It brings what the other lacks — bergamot, rose, grapefruit.
  • Freshness dominates, with citrus in the lead.
  • Our calculated profile has it at ease in 7 situations out of 8, where the other holds 5.

The verdict

  • Freshest

    Richwood — signature carried by citrus

  • Most enveloping

    Labdanum 18 — signature carried by gourmand and amber

  • Most versatile

    Richwood — 7 situations out of 8 suit it, against 5 for the other

  • Most original

    Labdanum 18 — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (castoreum, labdanum)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared