Price coming soon
The Envy of FOMO vs Richwood
from €380.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: The Envy of FOMO 80 out of 100, Richwood absent. Amber: The Envy of FOMO 53 out of 100, Richwood 80 out of 100. Gourmand: The Envy of FOMO 53 out of 100, Richwood 53 out of 100. Citrus: The Envy of FOMO 40 out of 100, Richwood 40 out of 100. Musky: The Envy of FOMO absent, Richwood 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Richwood
No exclusive notes.
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Top notes
the first half hour
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
The Envy of FOMO
Richwood
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Very suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose The Envy of FOMO
- Facets Richwood does not have: cedar, pepper, clove.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (carnation, clove): the less conventional of the two.
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose Richwood
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber and gourmand.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Richwood — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most original
The Envy of FOMO — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (carnation, clove)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.