Price coming soon
Lalique pour Homme vs Three
from €380.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Lalique pour Homme 80 out of 100, Three 40 out of 100. Woody: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Three 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Three absent. Amber: Lalique pour Homme 40 out of 100, Three 40 out of 100. Fruity: Lalique pour Homme absent, Three 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Lalique pour Homme
In common
Exclusive to Three
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Lalique pour Homme
Three
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Lalique pour Homme
- Its pyramid opens on jasmine, clary sage, nowhere to be found opposite.
- aromatic pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
Why choose Three
- oud, benzoin, davana: all materials absent from Lalique pour Homme.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (quince, red fruits): the less conventional of the two.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Lalique pour Homme — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Lalique pour Homme — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most original
Three — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (quince, red fruits)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.