from €29.00
Shaghaf Oud Ahmar vs Three
from €380.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Shaghaf Oud Ahmar 80 out of 100, Three 80 out of 100. Floral: Shaghaf Oud Ahmar 40 out of 100, Three absent. Fruity: Shaghaf Oud Ahmar 40 out of 100, Three 40 out of 100. Gourmand: Shaghaf Oud Ahmar 40 out of 100, Three 40 out of 100. Amber: Shaghaf Oud Ahmar absent, Three 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Three
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Top notes
the first half hour
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Shaghaf Oud Ahmar
Three
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Shaghaf Oud Ahmar
- The entry price is lower: €29.00 against €380.00.
- iris, apple, freesia: all materials absent from Three.
Why choose Three
- Its pyramid opens on benzoin, davana, lavender, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber and gourmand.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: quince, red fruits).
- The more expensive of the two (from €380.00).
The verdict
-
Best price
Shaghaf Oud Ahmar — €351.00 difference in its favour
-
Most enveloping
Three — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most original
Three — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (quince, red fruits)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.