from €195.00
Fleur Narcotique vs MYSLF
from €53.37
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Fleur Narcotique 80 out of 100, MYSLF 75 out of 100. Fruity: Fleur Narcotique 65 out of 100, MYSLF absent. Woody: Fleur Narcotique absent, MYSLF 65 out of 100. Musky: Fleur Narcotique 45 out of 100, MYSLF 50 out of 100. Amber: Fleur Narcotique absent, MYSLF 45 out of 100. Green: Fleur Narcotique 40 out of 100, MYSLF absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Fleur Narcotique
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Fleur Narcotique
- It brings what the other lacks — peach, white musk, peony.
- green pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- More track record: launched in 2013, it has been worn for 13 years.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (peach, peony): the less conventional of the two.
- The more expensive of the two (from €195.00).
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
Why choose MYSLF
- The entry price is lower: €53.37 against €195.00.
- Facets Fleur Narcotique does not have: amber, vetiver, patchouli.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
The verdict
-
Best price
MYSLF — €53.37 at the low end, while the other starts at €195.00
-
Freshest
Fleur Narcotique — signature carried by green
-
Most enveloping
MYSLF — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
MYSLF — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Fleur Narcotique — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (peach, peony)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.