from €195.00
Fleur Narcotique vs Mon Paris
Nose: Olivier Cresp
from €53.60
The scent fingerprint
Floral: Fleur Narcotique 80 out of 100, Mon Paris 65 out of 100. Fruity: Fleur Narcotique 65 out of 100, Mon Paris 80 out of 100. Patchouli: Fleur Narcotique absent, Mon Paris 55 out of 100. Sweet: Fleur Narcotique absent, Mon Paris 50 out of 100. Musky: Fleur Narcotique 45 out of 100, Mon Paris 40 out of 100. Green: Fleur Narcotique 40 out of 100, Mon Paris absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Mon Paris
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Fleur Narcotique
Mon Paris
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Fleur Narcotique
- It brings what the other lacks — peach, bergamot.
- Markedly fresher, carried by green.
- The more expensive of the two (from €195.00).
Why choose Mon Paris
- The entry price is lower: €53.60 against €195.00.
- Facets Fleur Narcotique does not have: strawberry, patchouli, raspberry.
- patchouli give it a roundness the other lacks.
The verdict
-
Best price
Mon Paris — €53.60 at the low end, while the other starts at €195.00
-
Freshest
Fleur Narcotique — signature carried by green
-
Most enveloping
Mon Paris — signature carried by patchouli
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.