Duel

Philosykos vs Hacivat

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Top notes the first half hour
Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes the trail that remains (4 h and more)

What are they for?

Philosykos
Hacivat
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Very suitable
Very suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Not its territory
Night
Not its territory
Not its territory
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Philosykos

  • It brings what the other lacks — coconut, fig, woody notes.
  • gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
  • Launched in 1996, it has 30 years of life behind it.
  • More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: fig, coconut).
  • No tracked point of sale to date.
  • Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.

Why choose Hacivat

  • Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
  • Facets Philosykos does not have: iris, pineapple, patchouli.
  • More recent creation (2017, against 1996).
  • No offer listed for the moment.
  • Less at ease in the “evenings & dates” context according to our calculated profile.

The verdict

  • Most concentrated

    Hacivat — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette

  • Most enveloping

    Philosykos — signature carried by gourmand

  • Most original

    Philosykos — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (fig, coconut)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared