Price coming soon
Fico di Amalfi vs Hacivat
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Hacivat absent. Woody: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Hacivat 70 out of 100. Citrus: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Hacivat 55 out of 100. Fruity: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Hacivat 80 out of 100. Green: Fico di Amalfi absent, Hacivat 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Fico di Amalfi
- fig, benzoin, pepper: all materials absent from Hacivat.
- Warmth wins out, with amber in support.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 5.
- Launched in 2007, it has 19 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Eau de Toilette: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
Why choose Hacivat
- Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- Its pyramid opens on iris, pineapple, patchouli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- citrus and green pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- It is 10 years younger (2017 against 2007).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Hacivat — Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette
-
Freshest
Hacivat — signature carried by citrus and green
-
Most enveloping
Fico di Amalfi — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Fico di Amalfi — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.