Price coming soon
Sauvage Elixir vs London Funk
from €250.00
The scent fingerprint
Warm spicy: Sauvage Elixir 85 out of 100, London Funk 40 out of 100. Woody: Sauvage Elixir 55 out of 100, London Funk 80 out of 100. Aromatic: Sauvage Elixir 65 out of 100, London Funk 46 out of 100. Amber: Sauvage Elixir 45 out of 100, London Funk 40 out of 100. Citrus: Sauvage Elixir 40 out of 100, London Funk absent
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Sauvage Elixir
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Sauvage Elixir
London Funk
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Very suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Very suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Sauvage Elixir
- Extrait de Parfum against eau de parfum: more material, and a longer expected longevity.
- patchouli, lavender, amber: all materials absent from London Funk.
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose London Funk
- Its pyramid opens on blackcurrant, juniper, vetiver, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: driftwood, basil).
- Eau de Parfum: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Sauvage Elixir — an extrait de parfum formula against an eau de parfum
-
Most original
London Funk — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (driftwood, basil)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.