Price coming soon
1957 vs Kryptonite Absolu
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Musky: 1957 80 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 82 out of 100. Woody: 1957 absent, Kryptonite Absolu 68 out of 100. Aldehydic: 1957 55 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 45 out of 100. Powdery: 1957 50 out of 100, Kryptonite Absolu 55 out of 100. Gourmand: 1957 absent, Kryptonite Absolu 42 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to 1957
Exclusive to Kryptonite Absolu
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
1957
Kryptonite Absolu
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 1957
- Its pyramid opens on white musk, bergamot, neroli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Parfum), it should last less long.
Why choose Kryptonite Absolu
- Richer concentration (Extrait de Parfum against Eau de Parfum): higher theoretical longevity.
- cedar, almond, sandalwood: all materials absent from 1957.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (almond, aldehydes): the less conventional of the two.
- No offer listed for the moment.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Kryptonite Absolu — Extrait de Parfum, so more material than an eau de parfum
-
Most original
Kryptonite Absolu — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (almond, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.