Price coming soon
1957 vs Kryptonite
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Musky: 1957 80 out of 100, Kryptonite 80 out of 100. Woody: 1957 absent, Kryptonite 65 out of 100. Aldehydic: 1957 55 out of 100, Kryptonite 45 out of 100. Powdery: 1957 50 out of 100, Kryptonite 55 out of 100. Gourmand: 1957 absent, Kryptonite 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to 1957
Exclusive to Kryptonite
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
1957
Kryptonite
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 1957
- white musk, bergamot, neroli: all materials absent from Kryptonite.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Eau de Parfum: the formula is more diluted than its rival's.
Why choose Kryptonite
- It is more concentrated — Extrait de Parfum where the other is eau de parfum — so theoretically more tenacious.
- Its pyramid opens on cedar, almond, sandalwood, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — almond, aldehydes are among the least common notes in our database.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Kryptonite — Extrait de Parfum, so more material than an eau de parfum
-
Most original
Kryptonite — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (almond, aldehydes)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.