from €25.95
Noa vs Wild Bluebell
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
What are they for?
Noa
Wild Bluebell
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Not its territory
Moments
Office
Suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Not its territory
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Noa
- Richer concentration (Eau de Toilette against Eau de Cologne): higher theoretical longevity.
- It brings what the other lacks — peony, freesia, bergamot.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand.
- Our calculated profile has it at ease in 8 situations out of 8, where the other holds 6.
Why choose Wild Bluebell
- Facets Noa does not have: persimmon, bluebell.
- It is 13 years younger (2011 against 1998).
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: persimmon, bluebell).
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Cologne), it should last less long.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Noa — Eau de Toilette, so more material than an eau de cologne
-
Most enveloping
Noa — signature carried by gourmand
-
Most versatile
Noa — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
Wild Bluebell — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (persimmon, bluebell)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.