Price coming soon
Sweet Redemption vs Into the Void
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Sweet Redemption 80 out of 100, Into the Void absent. Gourmand: Sweet Redemption 64 out of 100, Into the Void 80 out of 100. Woody: Sweet Redemption 40 out of 100, Into the Void 60 out of 100. Floral: Sweet Redemption 40 out of 100, Into the Void 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Sweet Redemption
In common
Exclusive to Into the Void
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Sweet Redemption
- incense, neroli, benzoin: all materials absent from Into the Void.
- amber and gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — tolu balsam, myrrh are among the least common notes in our database.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- “office” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Into the Void
- Its pyramid opens on oud, blackberry, patchouli, nowhere to be found opposite.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Sweet Redemption — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most original
Sweet Redemption — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (tolu balsam, myrrh)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.