Price coming soon
Sweet Redemption vs Harvest Mouse
from €200.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Sweet Redemption 80 out of 100, Harvest Mouse 53 out of 100. Woody: Sweet Redemption 40 out of 100, Harvest Mouse 80 out of 100. Gourmand: Sweet Redemption 64 out of 100, Harvest Mouse 40 out of 100. Floral: Sweet Redemption 40 out of 100, Harvest Mouse 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Sweet Redemption
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Sweet Redemption
Harvest Mouse
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Sweet Redemption
- incense, neroli, tolu balsam: all materials absent from Harvest Mouse.
- amber and gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- Less at ease in the “office” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Harvest Mouse
- Its pyramid opens on davana, bergamot, fir balsam, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — beer, fir balsam are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Sweet Redemption — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most original
Harvest Mouse — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (beer, fir balsam)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.