Price coming soon
Rolling in Love vs N°5
Nose: Ernest Beaux
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aldehydic: Rolling in Love absent, N°5 85 out of 100. Floral: Rolling in Love 50 out of 100, N°5 80 out of 100. Powdery: Rolling in Love 72 out of 100, N°5 60 out of 100. Musky: Rolling in Love 56 out of 100, N°5 40 out of 100. Woody: Rolling in Love absent, N°5 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Rolling in Love
N°5
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Rolling in Love
- Facets N°5 does not have: almond, amber.
- Released in 2013, when the other dates from 1921.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
Why choose N°5
- It brings what the other lacks — rose, vanilla, aldehydes.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aldehydic.
- 105 years of existence (1921): it has proved itself for longer.
- No offer listed for the moment.
The verdict
-
Freshest
N°5 — signature carried by aldehydic
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.