Duel

Burberry London for Women vs Woman in Gold

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes the trail that remains (4 h and more)

What are they for?

Burberry London for Women
Woman in Gold
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Very suitable
Summer
Suitable
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Burberry London for Women

  • honeysuckle, tiaré, mandarin: all materials absent from Woman in Gold.
  • More track record: launched in 2006, it has been worn for 20 years.
  • More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: tiaré, honeysuckle).
  • We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.

Why choose Woman in Gold

  • Its pyramid opens on tuberose, vanilla, aldehydes, nowhere to be found opposite.
  • Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand.
  • Released in 2017, when the other dates from 2006.
  • We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.

The verdict

  • Most enveloping

    Woman in Gold — signature carried by gourmand

  • Most original

    Burberry London for Women — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (tiaré, honeysuckle)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared