Price coming soon
Brit Rhythm for Men vs Polo Deep Blue
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aromatic: Brit Rhythm for Men 80 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Gourmand: Brit Rhythm for Men 80 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue absent. Musky: Brit Rhythm for Men 80 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100. Woody: Brit Rhythm for Men absent, Polo Deep Blue 80 out of 100. Leather: Brit Rhythm for Men 40 out of 100, Polo Deep Blue 53 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Brit Rhythm for Men
In common
Exclusive to Polo Deep Blue
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Brit Rhythm for Men
- juniper, styrax, verbena: all materials absent from Polo Deep Blue.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by gourmand and leather.
- More recent creation (2013, against 2003).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
Why choose Polo Deep Blue
- Its pyramid opens on mango, mandarin, clary sage, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Launched in 2003, it has 23 years of life behind it.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Brit Rhythm for Men — signature carried by gourmand and leather
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.