from €125.00
201 Gold September vs N°5
Nose: Ernest Beaux
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aldehydic: 201 Gold September absent, N°5 85 out of 100. Floral: 201 Gold September 80 out of 100, N°5 80 out of 100. Powdery: 201 Gold September absent, N°5 60 out of 100. Woody: 201 Gold September absent, N°5 45 out of 100. Musky: 201 Gold September absent, N°5 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to 201 Gold September
No exclusive notes.
In common
Exclusive to N°5
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
201 Gold September
N°5
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose 201 Gold September
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — ylang-ylang are among the least common notes in our database.
- Less at ease in the “winter” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose N°5
- rose, vanilla, aldehydes: all materials absent from 201 Gold September.
- aldehydic pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Less at ease in the “summer” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Freshest
N°5 — signature carried by aldehydic
-
Most original
201 Gold September — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (ylang-ylang)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.