Price coming soon
Gold Woman vs N°5
Nose: Ernest Beaux
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aldehydic: Gold Woman 55 out of 100, N°5 85 out of 100. Floral: Gold Woman 78 out of 100, N°5 80 out of 100. Powdery: Gold Woman absent, N°5 60 out of 100. Musky: Gold Woman 50 out of 100, N°5 40 out of 100. Woody: Gold Woman absent, N°5 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Gold Woman
In common
Exclusive to N°5
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Gold Woman
- Facets N°5 does not have: civet, lily, ambergris.
- It is 62 years younger (1983 against 1921).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — civet, lily are among the least common notes in our database.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
Why choose N°5
- It brings what the other lacks — vanilla, sandalwood, ylang-ylang.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (7 contexts out of 8, against 5).
- Launched in 1921, it has 105 years of life behind it.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
The verdict
-
Most versatile
N°5 — it holds 7 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 5
-
Most original
Gold Woman — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (civet, lily)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.