Price coming soon
Gold Man vs N°5
Nose: Ernest Beaux
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Aldehydic: Gold Man absent, N°5 85 out of 100. Floral: Gold Man 65 out of 100, N°5 80 out of 100. Powdery: Gold Man absent, N°5 60 out of 100. Musky: Gold Man 55 out of 100, N°5 40 out of 100. Woody: Gold Man 50 out of 100, N°5 45 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Gold Man
N°5
Seasons
Spring
Very suitable
Suitable
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Suitable
Suitable
Winter
Not its territory
Suitable
Moments
Office
Very suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Suitable
Suitable
Night
Not its territory
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Gold Man
- lavender, bergamot, ambergris: all materials absent from N°5.
- Released in 1998, when the other dates from 1921.
- No tracked point of sale to date.
- “winter” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose N°5
- Its pyramid opens on vanilla, aldehydes, jasmine, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly fresher, carried by aldehydic.
- More track record: launched in 1921, it has been worn for 105 years.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “summer” ground.
The verdict
-
Freshest
N°5 — signature carried by aldehydic
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.