Price coming soon
Fico di Amalfi vs Eden-Roc
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Eden-Roc absent. Woody: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Eden-Roc 80 out of 100. Citrus: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Eden-Roc 80 out of 100. Fruity: Fico di Amalfi 80 out of 100, Eden-Roc 40 out of 100. Musky: Fico di Amalfi absent, Eden-Roc 80 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
In common
Exclusive to Eden-Roc
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Fico di Amalfi
- Its pyramid opens on benzoin, jasmine, pepper, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Warmth wins out, with amber in support.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 6).
- More track record: launched in 2007, it has been worn for 19 years.
- No offer listed for the moment.
Why choose Eden-Roc
- white musk, cucumber: all materials absent from Fico di Amalfi.
- Released in 2015, when the other dates from 2007.
- Notes that are uncommon with us (cucumber, fig): the less conventional of the two.
- No offer listed for the moment.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
The verdict
-
Most enveloping
Fico di Amalfi — signature carried by amber
-
Most versatile
Fico di Amalfi — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Eden-Roc — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (cucumber, fig)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.