from €235.00
Olissipo vs Macaque Fuji Apple
from €54.00
The scent fingerprint
Gourmand: Olissipo 80 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple absent. Woody: Olissipo 60 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 80 out of 100. Amber: Olissipo 60 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Fruity: Olissipo 60 out of 100, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100. Aromatic: Olissipo absent, Macaque Fuji Apple 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Olissipo
- Facets Macaque Fuji Apple does not have: caramel, amber, davana.
- gourmand and amber give it a roundness the other lacks.
- The more expensive of the two (from €235.00).
- “summer” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.
Why choose Macaque Fuji Apple
- The cheaper of the two: from €54.00, against €235.00.
- It brings what the other lacks — oakmoss, hinoki, juniper.
- Freshness dominates, with aromatic in the lead.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
The verdict
-
Best price
Macaque Fuji Apple — €54.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €235.00
-
Freshest
Macaque Fuji Apple — signature carried by aromatic
-
Most enveloping
Olissipo — signature carried by gourmand and amber
-
Most versatile
Macaque Fuji Apple — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.