from €1,550.00
Amphorae 17 vs Camel
from €54.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Amphorae 17 80 out of 100, Camel 40 out of 100. Woody: Amphorae 17 absent, Camel 80 out of 100. Gourmand: Amphorae 17 53 out of 100, Camel 44 out of 100. Musky: Amphorae 17 53 out of 100, Camel absent. Floral: Amphorae 17 40 out of 100, Camel 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Amphorae 17
In common
Exclusive to Camel
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Heart notes
the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Amphorae 17
Camel
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Not its territory
Suitable
Everyday
Very suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Very suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Amphorae 17
- It brings what the other lacks — davana, benzoin, violet leaf.
- amber and gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
- Expect €1,550.00 at the very least, more than its rival.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “office” ground.
Why choose Camel
- The entry price is lower: €54.00 against €1,550.00.
- Facets Amphorae 17 does not have: civet, dried fruits, cedar.
The verdict
-
Best price
Camel — €54.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €1,550.00
-
Most enveloping
Amphorae 17 — signature carried by amber and gourmand
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.