from €250.00
Chicago High vs Morning Chess
from €250.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Chicago High 80 out of 100, Morning Chess 80 out of 100. Amber: Chicago High 53 out of 100, Morning Chess 80 out of 100. Leather: Chicago High 53 out of 100, Morning Chess 40 out of 100. Fruity: Chicago High 40 out of 100, Morning Chess absent. Citrus: Chicago High absent, Morning Chess 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
Chicago High
Morning Chess
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Not its territory
Summer
Suitable
Not its territory
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Suitable
Night
Suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Chicago High
- Its pyramid opens on champagne, honey, pineapple, nowhere to be found opposite.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: champagne, pineapple).
Why choose Morning Chess
- galbanum: all materials absent from Chicago High.
- citrus pull it towards the bright and the lively.
- Less at ease in the “spring” context according to our calculated profile.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Morning Chess — signature carried by citrus
-
Most versatile
Chicago High — it holds 8 of the 8 contexts we calculate, the other 6
-
Most original
Chicago High — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (champagne, pineapple)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.