Duel

Secret Oud vs Shaghaf Oud Royale

The scent fingerprint

What brings them together, what sets them apart

Exclusive to Secret Oud

Exclusive to Shaghaf Oud Royale

How they evolve on the skin

Notes shared by both perfumes.

Top notes the first half hour
Heart notes the central character (1 to 4 h)
Base notes the trail that remains (4 h and more)

What are they for?

Secret Oud
Shaghaf Oud Royale
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?

These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.

Why choose one… or the other?

Why choose Secret Oud

  • Facets Shaghaf Oud Royale does not have: pepper, vanilla, rose.
  • warm spicy and gourmand give it a roundness the other lacks.
  • The more expensive of the two (from €33.00).
  • “summer” is not its register, according to the profile we calculate.

Why choose Shaghaf Oud Royale

  • The cheaper of the two: from €29.00, against €33.00.
  • It brings what the other lacks — saffron, nutmeg, lavender.
  • Markedly fresher, carried by aromatic.
  • Notes that are uncommon with us (nutmeg, lavender): the less conventional of the two.

The verdict

  • Best price

    Shaghaf Oud Royale — €29.00 at the low end, while the other starts at €33.00

  • Freshest

    Shaghaf Oud Royale — signature carried by aromatic

  • Most enveloping

    Secret Oud — signature carried by warm spicy and gourmand

  • Most original

    Shaghaf Oud Royale — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (nutmeg, lavender)

Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.

Also compared