from €415.00
A Midsummer Dream vs 1986
from €235.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: A Midsummer Dream 80 out of 100, 1986 absent. Floral: A Midsummer Dream 40 out of 100, 1986 80 out of 100. Citrus: A Midsummer Dream 40 out of 100, 1986 40 out of 100. Warm spicy: A Midsummer Dream 40 out of 100, 1986 40 out of 100. Aromatic: A Midsummer Dream absent, 1986 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose A Midsummer Dream
- Its pyramid opens on cyclamen, rhubarb, aldehydes, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More versatile according to our calculated profile (8 contexts out of 8, against 6).
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — fir balsam, cyclamen are among the least common notes in our database.
- The more expensive of the two (from €415.00).
Why choose 1986
- Budget in its favour — €235.00 against €415.00.
- tea: all materials absent from A Midsummer Dream.
- Freshness dominates, with aromatic and citrus in the lead.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “winter” ground.
The verdict
-
Best price
1986 — from €235.00 against €415.00
-
Freshest
1986 — signature carried by aromatic and citrus
-
Most versatile
A Midsummer Dream — 8 situations out of 8 suit it, against 6 for the other
-
Most original
A Midsummer Dream — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (fir balsam, cyclamen)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.