from €54.95
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme vs Egra
Price coming soon
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Paco Rabanne Pour Homme 80 out of 100, Egra 80 out of 100. Amber: Paco Rabanne Pour Homme 53 out of 100, Egra 80 out of 100. Musky: Paco Rabanne Pour Homme 53 out of 100, Egra 80 out of 100. Citrus: Paco Rabanne Pour Homme 53 out of 100, Egra 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
- Its pyramid opens on oakmoss, carnation, rosemary, nowhere to be found opposite.
- More track record: launched in 1973, it has been worn for 53 years.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — carnation, rosemary are among the least common notes in our database.
- Less concentrated (Eau de Toilette), it should last less long.
Why choose Egra
- Richer concentration (Eau de Parfum against Eau de Toilette): higher theoretical longevity.
- lavender, vetiver, geranium: all materials absent from Paco Rabanne Pour Homme.
- It is 46 years younger (2019 against 1973).
- No tracked point of sale to date.
The verdict
-
Most concentrated
Egra — an eau de parfum formula against an eau de toilette
-
Most original
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (carnation, rosemary)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.