Price coming soon
Suede et Safran vs Attar Al Ghutra
from €82.00
The scent fingerprint
Amber: Suede et Safran 80 out of 100, Attar Al Ghutra 40 out of 100. Woody: Suede et Safran 80 out of 100, Attar Al Ghutra 80 out of 100. Leather: Suede et Safran 80 out of 100, Attar Al Ghutra 46 out of 100. Musky: Suede et Safran 80 out of 100, Attar Al Ghutra absent. Citrus: Suede et Safran absent, Attar Al Ghutra 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
What are they for?
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Suede et Safran
- Its pyramid opens on white musk, nowhere to be found opposite.
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Our calculated profile does not see it on “spring” ground.
Why choose Attar Al Ghutra
- bergamot, sandalwood, mandarin: all materials absent from Suede et Safran.
- Markedly fresher, carried by citrus.
- It covers more ground: 8 contexts out of 8 according to our calculated profile, against 6.
- Its formula is out of the ordinary — resin, thyme are among the least common notes in our database.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Attar Al Ghutra — signature carried by citrus
-
Most versatile
Attar Al Ghutra — at ease in 8 contexts out of 8, against 6
-
Most original
Attar Al Ghutra — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (resin, thyme)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.