Price coming soon
Honey Aoud vs Mukhallat Malaki
from €55.00
The scent fingerprint
Woody: Honey Aoud 80 out of 100, Mukhallat Malaki 80 out of 100. Amber: Honey Aoud 53 out of 100, Mukhallat Malaki 53 out of 100. Musky: Honey Aoud 53 out of 100, Mukhallat Malaki 53 out of 100. Gourmand: Honey Aoud 40 out of 100, Mukhallat Malaki absent. Citrus: Honey Aoud absent, Mukhallat Malaki 40 out of 100
What brings them together, what sets them apart
Exclusive to Honey Aoud
In common
Exclusive to Mukhallat Malaki
How they evolve on the skin
Notes shared by both perfumes.
Base notes
the trail that remains (4 h and more)
What are they for?
Honey Aoud
Mukhallat Malaki
Seasons
Spring
Suitable
Suitable
Summer
Not its territory
Suitable
Autumn
Very suitable
Very suitable
Winter
Very suitable
Suitable
Moments
Office
Suitable
Very suitable
Everyday
Suitable
Very suitable
Evenings & dates
Very suitable
Suitable
Night
Very suitable
Suitable
How is it calculated?
These markers are an editorial estimate calculated automatically from the perfume's real accords and their intensity, following the classic reading of scent families (hesperidics and aromatics shine in summer and at the office, ambers and gourmands in winter and in the evening…). They do not come from user votes and do not replace a test on skin.
Why choose one… or the other?
Why choose Honey Aoud
- Its pyramid opens on honey, nowhere to be found opposite.
- Markedly more enveloping, carried by amber and gourmand.
- More atypical composition in our catalogue (rare notes: honey, saffron).
- We have no price recorded at our retailers yet.
- Less at ease in the “summer” context according to our calculated profile.
Why choose Mukhallat Malaki
- bergamot: all materials absent from Honey Aoud.
- Markedly fresher, carried by citrus.
The verdict
-
Freshest
Mukhallat Malaki — signature carried by citrus
-
Most enveloping
Honey Aoud — signature carried by amber and gourmand
-
Most original
Honey Aoud — its notes are rarer in our catalogue (honey, saffron)
Each trophy applies to a specific use, not in absolute terms.